| To: | evilninja <evilninja@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected. |
| From: | Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 10 Sep 2005 21:08:48 +0200 (CEST) |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4322F25E.7000704@gmx.net> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509082156530.9425@alienAngel.home.sk> <4321CDDD.8010607@gmx.net> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509092130160.8548@alienAngel.home.sk> <4322F25E.7000704@gmx.net> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, evilninja wrote: Hello. > > out of curiosity: why are you running a SGI-CVS kernel anyway? what am i > missing with a stock kernel? kdb, some important fixes. I just downloaded vanilla 2.6.13 and it seems that for example "TAKE 941429 - Retry linux inode cacech lookup if we found a stale inode" is not there. It is simpler to use SGI CVS tree than patch vanilla tree. And my long-term experience is that SGI tree is stable. jan -- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected., evilninja |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected., Jan Derfinak |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected., evilninja |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected., Jan Derfinak |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |