xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: BLKGETSIZE64, BLKBSZSET, BLKSSZGET definition in xfsprogs.

To: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: BLKGETSIZE64, BLKBSZSET, BLKSSZGET definition in xfsprogs.
From: Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 12:35:14 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3F8382D3.5050703@backtobasicsmgmt.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0310060739360.16790@alienAngel.home.sk> <20031006055957.GC1001@frodo> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0310071107220.1331@alienAngel.home.sk> <3F82C06A.1020808@backtobasicsmgmt.com> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0310071542510.1331@alienAngel.home.sk> <3F82CFFB.2000209@backtobasicsmgmt.com> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0310072003480.1331@alienAngel.home.sk> <3F8382D3.5050703@backtobasicsmgmt.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:

> Jan Derfinak wrote:
>
> > Is there any reason to stay with old definition and have different
> > definition of these macros in kernel and in xfsprogs?
> > Did I miss something?
> >
>
> There is no particular reason to stay with the old definitions, but
> there's no particular reason (or rush) to change them either. The two

I disagree with you. The old definition isn't good and change in kernel is
reasonable. Not syncing xfsprogs with kernel brings confusion to source code
and in current status xfsprogs are not compilable with recent kernel.

                                jan

-- 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>