On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Scott Fagg wrote:
>
> I spoke too soon, the problem has resurfaced.
>
> Not as bad as before. I filled the volume up, got no errors. But at some
> point after that, quite possibly during an xfs_check or xfs_repair OR
> deleting large chunks of data the problem resurfaced.
>
> I fear that it's probably beyond my to fix this ( kernerl filesystem drivers
> is not one of my strong points ). I'm trying to work out exactly what the
> error is telling my. What is the implication of XFS_ERRLEVEL_LOW vs
> XFS_ERRLEVEL_HIGH ? ( a google search turned up nothing ).
It works with /proc/sys/fs/xfs/error_level, to determine when more verbose
errors should be printed to the syslog. /proc/sys/fs/xfs/error_level
works like a volume control - from 0 to 11, with 11 being the noisiest
(i.e. the most information printed for the least severe errors)
There are actually only a few "detents" on the volume control though,
so you won't notice a difference between, say, 4 and 5, currently.
-Eric
|