re[2]: filesystem size difference ? ;-)

To:	Greg Freemyer <freemyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	re[2]: filesystem size difference ? ;-)
From:	Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:21:30 +0200 (CEST)
Cc:	XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to:	<20030429201151.CIZR25339.imf54bis.bellsouth.net@tiger2>
Sender:	linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, Greg Freemyer wrote:

> Do you know if xfs 1.2 is officially supported in 8.2, or is it still 
> experimental?

I'm not SuSE's official spokesman so I will answer in this way:
I don't know about any problems with XFS in SuSE Linux 8.2. Of course you
must use libattr package from updates. On my build and test machine I use
SL 8.2 with LVM and XFS perform well. This is XFS only system.
From my sight SL 8.2 is big step forward in XFS support.

                                jan

-- 
----- I can't get no satisfaction -----
                        Rolling Stones

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), (continued) Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Danny Cox Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Dmitry Melekhov Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Jan Derfinak Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Dmitry Melekhov Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Jan Derfinak Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Juri Haberland Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Nathan Straz Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Dmitry Melekhov Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Dmitry Melekhov re[2]: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Greg Freemyer re[2]: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Jan Derfinak <=

Previous by Date:	AW: xfsdumping of LVM-Snapshots whith quotas, Pedot, Wolfgang
Next by Date:	Re: XFS in 2.4.21-rc1-ac3, D. Stimits
Previous by Thread:	re[2]: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Greg Freemyer
Next by Thread:	TAKE - merge up to 2.5.68, Steve Lord
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]