xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

re: quota patch

To: Ian Cumming <ian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: re: quota patch
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 09:56:00 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20020421090915.GA2108@ids.org.au>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Ian - 

If the patch you obtained has "1.1" in the name, then you don't need
the latest quota patch that Nathan checked in; quota in 1.1 is
a bit different from what's currently in CVS, and as far as I know,
quota functionality is fine.

If you're running a production machine, I would use the 1.1 release.

-Eric

On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Ian Cumming wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I'm currently running kernel 2.4.18 + xfs patch set obtained from the
> "latest" folder in the development pages on oss.sgi.com
> 
> With regards to the quota fix submitted to CVS, should I update from
> CVS, download 1.1, or just try to patch the quota.c file?
> 
> I'm running a "production" server, so the userland quota functionality
> would be desirable - which way is the best to get the quota stuff (and
> ACLs) in a functionable state? (cvs or 1.1)

-- 
Eric Sandeen      XFS for Linux     http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>