| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | OOM difference on IRIX vs. linux |
| From: | James Rich <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:14:53 -0700 (MST) |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Steve,
I think you mentioned on this list a while ago that XFS comes from
an environment (IRIX) where allocating memory could not fail. At least
that is what I understood you to say. Since hardware resources are
limited on every platform I'm stumped on how this could be. Could you
give a basic explanation of why this works on IRIX but not on linux
(without giving away any company secrets :) )? I realize this may be
somewhat demanding so you could also tell me to take a hike :)
James Rich
james@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS/NFS server oops ..... any ideas., Ian D. Hardy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: OOM difference on IRIX vs. linux, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | TAKE - fix out-of-line attribute data, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: OOM difference on IRIX vs. linux, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |