| To: | Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Million files or so on RAID 5 Partition |
| From: | Matteo Centonza <matteo@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 6 Mar 2002 10:06:57 +0100 (CET) |
| Cc: | Martin Spott <Martin.Spott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3C85BEBC.37645CE6@ch.sauter-bc.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi Simon, > > Just to be curious (as always ....): Do you use the old 'md' driver for this > > or LVM ? Should I stay away from one of these (despite the issues with > > internal log on RAID5) ? > > IIRC you can not use LVM to create RAID5 devices, just RAID0,1. Anyway > it seems to be not so sure that we always have a working LVM for every > kernel (Isn't it broken at this time for 2.5?). MD should be more safe > here. Not that sure AFAICT. The same problem happened for RAID 5 recently (in 2.5). BTW LVM has been fixed and it's working fine. In my case, i have LVM stacked on RAID5 with internal log. Is it possible that this configuration doesn't suffer the performance penalty? Just curious. Ciao, -m |
| Previous by Date: | Re: external log config [was: Million files or so on RAID 5 Partition], Simon Matter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - fix super block reference leak, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Million files or so on RAID 5 Partition, Simon Matter |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Million files or so on RAID 5 Partition, Martin K. Petersen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |