xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Stable XFS+Kernel combo

To: Blake Barnett <blake.barnett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Stable XFS+Kernel combo
From: Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 22:18:31 -0500 (EST)
Cc: <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1007426524.28458.8.camel@shiva>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
I'm using the 2.4.14 rpm from the oss.sgi site, and it's been working 
fine, so far.

On 3 Dec 2001, Blake Barnett wrote:

> In the opinion of the XFS masters, what would be the most stable
> XFS-enabled kernel at this point?   I've been using 2.4.9+XFS for a
> while and it seems pretty solid.  But I'm wondering if one of the newer
> ones is working out very well.  I'd like to get the benefits of the new
> VM, etc.
> 
> I'm about to put a server in production with some large filesystems and
> I'd like to use XFS,  I don't want to have to upgrade the kernel for a
> while on this box though... 
> 
> Suggestions/Opinions please!
> 
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>