xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS+Tux = patch trouble

To: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS+Tux = patch trouble
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 10:52:13 +0100 (CET)
Cc: Tux mailing list <tux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>, XFS Mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <18795.1005032621@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au>
Reply-to: <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Keith Owens wrote:

> On Tue, 6 Nov 2001 09:20:08 +0100 (CET),
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >it would be nice if SGI folks pushed harder for XFS's integration into the
> >mainstream kernel.
>
> We have been trying hard since at least 2.4.5.  I split the big XFS
> patch into digestible chunks, separating the core XFS code from the
> add on stuff like kdb, lvm, dmapi, quota.  We have been sending mail
> to Linus about the core XFS patches since June 5, 2001.  Response -
> total silence.  Not even "I don't like it", we get no response at all.

i dont think Linus is the first step needed. XFS is pretty intrusive in
the VFS area, so i guess you should first sort out the necessery VFS
modifications with Al Viro? And then go step by step forward. I mean, we
are in a stable kernel branch and this is a pretty big patch even just
counting the core changes.

        Ingo


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>