xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: On RAID, inode size, stripe size (was: Playing around with NFS+XFS)

To: Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: On RAID, inode size, stripe size (was: Playing around with NFS+XFS)
From: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 00:01:44 +0800 (PHT)
In-reply-to: <200109051536.f85FaOO05864@jen.americas.sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001 at 10:36, Steve Lord wrote:
> This is not a raid5 thing, it is a filesystem size issue, once you get
> above 1 Tbyte in filesystem size then xfs inode numbers (which are
> really a disk address) can take more than 32 bits. Since lots of linux
> code, including NFS, does not cope with this, we need to change things
> in xfs so that a larger inode is used, this reduces the number of
> addressing bits required down to below 32 bits again.

So on filesystems <1TB you can safely use the default of 256 bytes?

 --> Jijo

--
Federico Sevilla III  :: jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Network Administrator :: The Leather Collection, Inc.
GnuPG Key: <http://jijo.leathercollection.ph/jijo.gpg>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>