xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Slides for a talk I will be making

To: Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Slides for a talk I will be making
From: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 18:47:02 +0800 (PHT)
In-reply-to: <00fa01c12c87$944e4890$0900a8c0@talby>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001 at 12:28, Hans Kratz wrote:
> The Reiserfs slides state that link() on Reiserfs is not synchronous.
> This is correct but is the same not true for XFS as well?

This I do not know, either. Thank you for bringing this up. There is a
clear FAQ entry about ReiserFS not treating link() as synchronous because
of issues with QMail (and most other mail transfer agents, I think, but am
not sure).

I was under the impression that XFS treated the link() as a synchronous
operation. Maybe the experts can shed some light on this?

> Whatever is the case you should state if XFS link()/unlink() is
> synchronous on the XFS slides for symmetry reasons.

I agree. Thank you very much for the feedback. I will put information on
this in my slides as soon as I get a response from the XFS development
team.

 --> Jijo

--
Federico Sevilla III  :: jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Network Administrator :: The Leather Collection, Inc.
GnuPG Key: <http://jijo.leathercollection.ph/jijo.gpg>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>