xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New Redhat 7.1 kernel patch

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: New Redhat 7.1 kernel patch
From: Juha Saarinen <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 09:02:10 +1200 (NZST)
Cc: "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <3B37A581.5D0F333F@sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Eric Sandeen wrote:

> Linux XFS is _not_ based on RH's distro, that's just one convenient way
> that we package it for the masses.  :)  XFS development has always been
> based on Linus' tree.
>
> Red Hat RPMs are just a "fun" (?!) side project for Linux XFS.

Aiiee... OK, lemme rephrase the question, your honour: if I would like to
set up an XFS server, which part should I go with?

As it is, won't most people use the "RH XFS" version, ie. install from the
ISOs?

-- 
Regards,


Juha

PGP fingerprint:
B7E1 CC52 5FCA 9756 B502  10C8 4CD8 B066 12F3 9544


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>