xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Does XFS require DevFs?

To: Joseph Fannin <jhf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Does XFS require DevFs?
From: Juha Saarinen <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:51:31 +1200 (NZST)
Cc: "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20010614183114.A24007@zion.rivenstone.net>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
No, AFAICT it doesn't require devfs.

What sort of hardware do you have?


-- 
Regards,


Juha

PGP fingerprint:
B7E1 CC52 5FCA 9756 B502  10C8 4CD8 B066 12F3 9544

On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Joseph Fannin wrote:

>      I've searched the archives but found no answer to this question:
> Does XFS require DevFS?  Or can I build a kernel for my system
> (installed from the XFS RH7.1 .iso) that does not include devfs
> without having problems?
>
>     I've been completely unable to build a working kernel using either
> the RH-2.96 or egcs -- the build either fails or gives me a kernel
> that produces random segfaults, oopsen, and fs corruption.  I've tried
> the .src.rpm on the .iso, the 2.4.3 patches and the CVS devel tree.
>
>     Often I get oopses in rc.sysinit at about the time it tries to
> activate quota support -- do I need quota support built in?
>
>     I'm not exactly new at building kernels, but I'm no coder, and my
> inability to build a working kernel with XFS support is frustrating me
> to say the least.  Should I post ksymoops output, am I doing something
> obviously wrong, or should I provide more [detailed | organized]
> information?  Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> --
> Joseph Fannin
> jhf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Bull in pure form is rare; there is usually some contamination by data."
>     -- William Graves Perry Jr.
>
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>