xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Memory consumption

To: Tom Carroll <tcarroll@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Memory consumption
From: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 13:26:17 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20010524134931.C30044@chimesnet.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
A question to ask here is does type of hardware fit into this equation? As
in :

SMP vs Uni
SCSI vs IDE
# of volumes/drives etc.

-- 
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-796-9023
email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Thu, 24 May 2001, Tom Carroll wrote:

> It is not just a dump.  This behavior is evident within most
> operations that touch the filesystem.
>
> Examples include compiling, untarring, samba, etc.
>
> -Tom Carroll
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 12:41:52PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote:
> > > Hey,
> > >
> > > I just compiled linux-2.4-xfs 24/05/2001 16:30 GMT.
> > >
> > > The large memory consumption issue still exists.  The previous
> > > snapshot of /proc/slabinfo is accurate.
> > >
> > > Any suggestions?
> > >   Thanks in advance.
> > >
> > > -Tom Carroll
> >
> > OK, if the machine survives the failing dump process does the filesystem
> > unmount afterwards? I will go an run some quick tests, but it smells of
> > a reference count leak - dump uses a backdoor open function rather
> > than pathnames, this is probably where the problem is.
> >
> > Steve
> >
> >
> >
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>