| To: | Jan-Frode Myklebust <janfrode@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: devfsd-1.3.11-1 |
| From: | Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 May 2001 14:37:32 -0500 (CDT) |
| Cc: | <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20010503205516.A633@ii.uib.no> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
I should've been more specific. I was under the assumption that you couldn't really use devfsd if devfs was not compiled into the kernel. Sorry for the confusion. What I really want to do is patch a 2.4.4 kernel to use XFS without using devfs. That part I don't think would be an issue, and I understand all that's involved here. One thing I'd like to be able to do though is to know how to properly patch a 2.4.4 kernel upto xfs. Should I get a 2.4.2 kernel, patch it with xfs, then patch it up to 2.4.4? Ideas? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: strange files, XFS bug?, Juha Saarinen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: strange files, XFS bug?, Juha Saarinen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: devfsd-1.3.11-1, Jan-Frode Myklebust |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE - Bring the development tree to 2.4.4, Russell Cattelan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |