| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: devfsd-1.3.11-1 |
| From: | Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 2 May 2001 11:24:03 -0500 (CDT) |
| Cc: | <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3AF031FB.445D4F7D@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
So is it ok to use it then? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx On Wed, 2 May 2001, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Austin Gonyou wrote: > > > > Is it possible to update devfsd to 2.x, the one that comes with RH 7.1? > > The devfsd "version" that comes with Red Hat Linux is deceptive - they > generate it out of the kernel SRPM, and it gets the same version as the > kernel. > > The actual devfsd version is still 1.3.x, it's just that the rpm is > versioned differently for some reason. > > -Eric > > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Anyone have any luck with the RPMs?, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Anyone have any luck with the RPMs?, Peter Pauly |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: devfsd-1.3.11-1, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: devfsd-1.3.11-1, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |