| To: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Follow up -- Re: Files on XFS not safe?! |
| From: | Dan Hollis <goemon@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 6 Dec 2001 13:11:10 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: | Xianglong Yuan <yuanx@xxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <4.3.2.7.2.20011206084345.02e5c618@pop.xs4all.nl> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Seth Mos wrote: > Tux2 seems to be a really good idea for static content systems but I am > afraid that databases will not like phase trees. Why would they care? I can't see that it would make a single difference at all. -Dan -- [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-] |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: How to fsck read-only-mounted root filesystem?, Dan Hollis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Linux w/XFS on Athlon systems, Gabe E. Nydick |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Follow up -- Re: Files on XFS not safe?!, Seth Mos |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Follow up -- Re: Files on XFS not safe?!, Seth Mos |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |