> Hmm is it RedHat specific? The last time I updated mkinitrd I had revert the
> mktemp portion; as Redhat seems to be the only one that supports mktemp -d
> (aka temp directory)
well, I still have the part of the patch that takes out the mktemp stuff
in there, but I also am shipping mktemp rpms so that it will work on other
distro's. i was going to eventually revert it back to redhat's way.
> The rpm's I'm building for prerelease 0.10 has XFS build into the kernel
> which
> renders the changes to mkinitrd un necessary unless somebody really wants
> have
> XFS as a module again.
why are you building different rpms than the one's in LBS?
this makes no sense. we should release xfs with the lbs so we get the
added exposure on LBS as well.
-tduffy
|