| To: | Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan <ananth@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Repeatable Panics with XFS and RAID1 (long) |
| From: | Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Feb 2001 07:44:33 -0200 (BRST) |
| Cc: | dcox@xxxxxxxxxx, Linux-XFS <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3A943966.8F27E502@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan wrote: > Danny wrote: > > > Feb 20 12:51:38 dsc_proto_1 kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation > > failed. > > For those seeing __alloc_pages failing, can you please try this patch? > With recent code changes, writepage() is used for flushing dirty pages, > and this typically happens under memory pressure. So, doing anything > expensive to allocate memory under these conditions is bad. Ananth, I think allocating memory from the atomic queue (used mainly by in interrupt context) to generate dirty data may cause problems. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RedHat Linux 7.0 with SGI XFS, Keith Owens |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Repeatable Panics with XFS and RAID1 (long), Marcelo Tosatti |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Repeatable Panics with XFS and RAID1 (long), Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Repeatable Panics with XFS and RAID1 (long), Marcelo Tosatti |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |