| To: | linux xfs mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: the thing with the binary zeroes |
| From: | David J N Begley <d.begley@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:48:43 +1100 (EST) |
| In-reply-to: | <m1k6pfurpd.fsf@muc.de> |
| References: | <20050211121829.GA30049@localhost.localdomain><m1sm43uu8h.fsf@mu c.de> <20050211131546.GA32336@localhost.localdomain><m1oeeruswr.fsf@muc.de> <20050211133558.GA32501@localhost.localdomain> <m1k6pfurpd.fsf@muc.de> |
| Reply-to: | David J N Begley <d.begley@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Andi Kleen wrote: > The only good "fix" probably would be to make XFS flush metadata less > aggressively. If the metadata was always flushed at roughly the same time > as the file data is written you would rarely see this. Are you talking here about implementing an "ordered journal" (similar to ext3) where data is written before metadata updates, or simply reducing the time between data/metadata flushes without imposing any ordering? Thanks.. |
| Previous by Date: | multithreaded processors and xfs, Pablo Cruz Navea |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: the thing with the binary zeroes, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: the thing with the binary zeroes, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: the thing with the binary zeroes, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |