xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: external log vs internal log and mkfs.xfs options

To: David Sparks <daves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: external log vs internal log and mkfs.xfs options
From: Matt Stegman <matts@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:32:52 -0600 (CST)
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <42081627.4090307@activestate.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, David Sparks wrote:
>
> Nobody commented on this question though, I'll put it up again.  Most of
> the information I've gathered on external logs dates back to the IRIX
> days -- I hope there isn't anything out of date there.
>
>  > Regarding external logs, I've never formatted a XFS with an external
>  > log.  From what I can gather (google, man pages), doing so is supposed
>  > to reduce disk head seeking hence performance is improved.  Is anyone
>  > aware of any benchmarks that explore internal/external logs and sizes?
>  > My preference is for an internal log as that just simplifies things.
>
> Is there any advantage to an external log on a separate partition on the
> same device, as opposed to an external log on a separate device?
> Basically is an external log only for performance benefits or are there
> robustness benefits also?

--
Matt Stegman




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>