| To: | Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: %u-order allocation failed |
| From: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 5 Oct 2001 22:31:38 +0200 (CEST) |
| Cc: | Krzysztof Rusocki <kszysiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0110051721550.26495-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Seth Mos wrote: > > > This happens using either 2.4.10-xfs or 2.4.11-pre3-xfs. > > Ohh duh, IIRC there are a bunch of highmem bugs in > -linus which are fixed in -ac. Fitting XFS onto a -ac kernel should be fun :-( I will try this over the weekend or get a redhat kernel going which is also -ac based. That would come in handy for other people using XFS since a lot are using highmem in combination with this fs. > Can you reproduce the bug with an -ac kernel ? I am not that good/fast at patching. Expect something over the weekend :-) Bye Seth |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Fwd: Cluster XFS install without CD...], kris buggenhout |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Cluster XFS install without CD..., kris buggenhout |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: %u-order allocation failed, Rik van Riel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: %u-order allocation failed, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |