xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Linux 2.4.4 + xfs

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.4 + xfs
From: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 22:14:25 +0200 (CEST)
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105071428210.1715-100000@UberGeek.coremetrics.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Austin Gonyou wrote:

> I'm using the 2.4.4 source tree from SGI's cvs. I must say, it is quite
> nice. I've still got some kinda slow sluggish thing happening to my
> system, Don't know if that's nautilus causing that or if it's XFS or what.
> The odd thing is this only started happening after I upgraded to 7.1 with
> XFS. Anyway, I've had no stability problems with the 2.4.4 kernel in a
> production office environment, and continue to use it to this day. If you
> have any problems lemme know.

For server use it seems to hold up reasonably well for something which
is not thoroughly tested ;)
The test machine at work holded up nicely when doing some light testing.
Samba seemed a bit sluggish during kernel compiles though. This was a
redhat 7.0 system and is upgraded using the SGI xfs installer. This is a
standard dell desktop machine with a PIII 450 256MB ram and a 40GB IDE
disk.

On my home machine I had a machine lockup during browsing with mozilla but 
that could have been because of the nvidia drivers for my TNT2.
I had been playing "soldier of fortune" for a couple of hours and went
browsing after that. It locked up about 5 minutes after that.
Last thing I saw in the log was the unloading of es1371. No messages after
that :-/

All in all it's actually positive. The work machine stayed up and the home
game machines are up faster after a crash with xfs :-)

Bye
Seth


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>