xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3

To: "Robin Rosenberg" <robin.rosenberg.lists@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Felipe Alfaro Solana" <felipe_alfaro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3
From: "Mike Gigante" <mg@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 21:24:10 +1100
Cc: "David Weinehall" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Andrew Ho" <andrewho@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Dax Kelson" <dax@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Peter Nelson" <pnelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Hans Reiser" <reiser@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ext2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx>, <jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <200403031059.26483.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wednesday 03 March 2004 10:43, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> But XFS easily breaks down due to media defects. Once ago I used XFS,
> but I lost all data on one of my volumes due to a bad block on my hard
> disk. XFS was unable to recover from the error, and the XFS recovery
> tools were unable to deal with the error.

A single bad-block rendered the entire filesystem non-recoverable 
for XFS? Sounds difficult to believe since there is redundancy such
as multiple copies of the superblock etc.

I can believe you lost *some* data, but "lost all my data"??? -- I 
believe that you'd have to had had *considerably* more than 
"a bad block" :-)

Mike


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>