xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Data Corruption Problem

To: ashahi@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Data Corruption Problem
From: mahesh.babbar@xxxxxx
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:58:14 +0530
Cc: freemyer-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
     Freinds,
     
     Please recall that a week before I put up a similar problem and I was 
     told that the problem could be beause of the ancient code of XFS (2 
     years old) I am running on my box. 
     
     Answer was that new XFS code is stable, proven and works without any 
     issues and there no *VERY CRITICAL* issues like data corruption.
     
     Aman's problem's source may have been different to mine but the 
     bottomlime is that "There could still be a major stability issue even 
     with newer XFS codes".
     
     Steve/Lonnie : I don't want to sound un-neccessarily finiky and I 
     completely trust communitiy's ability to set things right, my only 
     submission is that there could still be grey areas
     
     Best Regards
     
     Mahesh
     
     
     
     
     
     
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: RE: Data Corruption Problem
Author:  ashahi (ashahi@xxxxxxxxxxx) at internet 
Date:    7/30/2003 6:39 PM
     
     
     
Hi Greg,
     
I have a shared storage solution as you mentioned, and am using our 
own HA software. We do take care of the fact that the current LVM is 
not cluster aware.
     
regards,
Aman.
     
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Freemyer [mailto:freemyer-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 12:14 AM
To: Aman Shahi
Cc: 'linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: Re: Data Corruption Problem
     
Are you saying you have a shared storage solution with 2 LVs that you 
move back and forth between 2 clustered nodes?
     
If so, I personally would use Linux-HA (heartbeat) in combination with 
EVMS 2.0.
     
EVMS 2.0 is an alternative to LVM, but it understands clustering and in 
particular it can use heartbeat for its cluster comm.
     
If you use LVM, I think you have to add a lot of custom scripting to 
make sure LVM does not screw up due to clustering issues.  (i.e. LVM is 
totally cluster unaware.  EVMS is cluster aware.)
     
HTH
Greg
-- 
Greg Freemyer
     
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 17:45, Aman Shahi wrote: 
> Hi,
> I am using linux 2.4.20 + LVM 1.0.7 +
> XFS(snapshot-xfs-2.4.20-2003-04-07_05:19_UTC with ACLs, no debug enabled).
     
> 
> I created couple of Logical Volumes using LVM, and then created/mounted 
file
> system over it. I am running some NFS Client doing I/O over different 
files
> in these file systems. I am doing Failover/Failback testing. That is I 
have
> one filestem attached to one node and other to the second node. When I 
fail
> one of the node, the other node takes over the file system of the second 
> node. When trying to mount the file system of the second node, I am 
getting
> File System corruption.
> 
> Could anybody tell what is the problem here. Attached here is the output 
> from "dmesg".
> 
> thanks in Advance,
> 
> Aman.
     
     
     


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>