xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFs stability

To: logiplex@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFs stability
From: mahesh.babbar@xxxxxx
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 18:34:34 +0530
Cc: mahesh.babbar@xxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
     Thanks for the response Mike & Cliff,
     
     On our server though, which is basically a file server, serving 
     clients files over NFS. We have had 4-5 instances of xfs_shutdown 
     with message like "in-core memory corruption...." . 
     
     The exact messages are: 
     
     kerrnel: xfs_force_shutdown(lvm(58,2),0x8) called from line 1035 of 
     file xfs_trans.c.  Return address = 0xc01cc10a
     kernel: Corruption of in-memory data detected.  Shutting down 
     filesystem: lvm(58,2)
     kernel: Please umount the filesystem, and rectify the problem(s)
     
     At once, we had lost data even after repairing the filesystem using 
     xfs_repair and that too production data. Clearly, we are a worried lot 
     !
     
     Would appreciate if I can get some information on concrete advantages 
     which XFS has over ext3/2 in terms of stability (specially as a file 
     server, performnace (with figures e.g how much % write/read gain) and 
     features. 
     
     I believe we are using the XFS version which is as old as July 2001.
     
     Regards,
     Mahesh
     
     
     >Mike Burger wrote
     
     
     
     >FWIW, I've been running XFS on my server (not a very busy server, 
     >granted) for a couple of years, now, and haven't had any problems. 
     >
     >On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 mahesh.babbar@xxxxxx wrote:
     
     
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: XFs stability
Author:  logiplex (logiplex@xxxxxxxxx) at internet 
Date:    7/21/2003 10:44 PM
     
     
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 09:20, mahesh.babbar@xxxxxx wrote: 
>      Hi ,
>      
>      I am totally new to XFs world so please bear with me for my ignorance. 
>      
>      My query is how stable xfs is ? Or let's say which version of it is 
>      most stable.
     
I use XFS exclusively on all my machines (at home and work).  This 
includes several desktops, a laptop, a couple of servers and even my 
firewall.  I've been using it for at least two years.  No other 
available filesystem (well, I haven't tested JFS and probably won't 
until I've got a 64-bit CPU) matches XFS for performance and 
reliability.  EXT3 is a joke (why *does* it need to fsck?), and 
ReiserFS, although very interesting, has had numerous problems.  My PC's 
have been turned off, crashed, and even attacked by ferrets without 
losing data or requiring repair.  What more can you ask of a filesystem?
     
Regards,
     
-- 
Cliff Wells, Software Engineer
Logiplex Corporation (www.logiplex.net) 
(503) 978-6726  (800) 735-0555
     
     


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>