xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution

To: "Net Llama!" <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution
From: "Wilkins, Vern" <vwilkins@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 10:10:43 -0500
Cc: <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcVP/227xIwRiH61QEGgplbTiKpXDAAubnX9
Thread-topic: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution
>How many boxes are you currently maintaining?

Just three Gentoo servers, a few windows 2003 servers, and a lot of Windows and 
Gentoo workstations.  Our department has several additional Gentoo servers 
managed by other staff, and across campus there are numerous larger departments 
with a lot of Gentoo workstations and servers.  I probably shouldn't say which 
ones for security reasons, but we have had numerous departments on campus move 
completely from FreeBSD and/or other Linux distributions to Gentoo.  I notice 
there's a lot of rivalry and distribution loyalty with Linux now, and a lot of 
people really dislike Gentoo, but my point is just that it has worked really 
well for us.

I don't manage a lot of Gentoo servers, and they are all running only a few 
services, but I can say from the workstation side, that managing more machines 
does not result in a linear increase in workload.  We've always had a very 
diverse infrastructure of Windows, Netware, various Linux/Unix servers and 
managed them more or less individually.  As we've consolidated and come up with 
more centralized ways of managing our machines, it's all gotten a lot easier, 
but especially the management of the Gentoo machines.

Vern



-----Original Message-----
From:   Net Llama! [mailto:netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent:   Tue 5/3/2005 11:45 AM
To:     Wilkins, Vern
Cc:     linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:        RE: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution 
How many boxes are you currently maintaining?

On Tue, 3 May 2005, Wilkins, Vern wrote:

> I use Gentoo exclusively.  It's definitely not for everyone, but I've used at 
> least a dozen distributions pretty heavily and have phased out using anything 
> else over the last few years.  Not so much fun to install and you aren't 
> going to get commercial support like with RedHat, Suse, etc, but much easier 
> to maintain in the long run.
>
> Vern
> Senior Technology Specialist
> Indiana University Libraries
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of zwlu@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Tue 5/3/2005 11:07 AM
> To:   linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc:
> Subject:      Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution
> Hi XFS gurus,
>
> I am building a Linux based File server used mainly as user home directories.
> These are mainly students who conduct research in computer graphics,
> data analysis.  Here are my hardware:
>
> DELL Poweredge 2850 server with Apple Xserve Raid (~ 1.8 TB) with fibre
> connection between the two.
>
> I have installed RHEL4 (x86_64) and enabled XFS (by consulting
> at the archive here).  XFS appears to work okay, but  I have not
> tested the system heavily yet.  I am a little bit of uncomfortable with the
> fact that XFS is not officially supported on RHEL4.  RHEL4 will stay on the
> 2.6.9 kernel for as long as they can, while the XFS patches will not make into
> the Redhat kernel source there.
>
> I am wondering what other people on this list is using currently.  SUSE?
> I also wonder if the Veritas Netbackup will work the distribution, right now
> we are using Netbackup Data Center 4.5MP8 here.
>
> Thank you very much for share your thoughts.
>
>
>

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lonni J Friedman                        netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
LlamaLand                               http://netllama.linux-sxs.org





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>