| To: | "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs corrupted |
| From: | Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:07:22 -0600 |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <525D8D67.2090301@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1381826507281-35009.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131015203434.2f336fd8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <525D8D67.2090301@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Oct 15, 2013, at 12:45 PM, Stefanita Rares Dumitrescu <katmai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > What worries me is that i see 100 % cpu usage, some 74 % memory usage (i have > 4 gb ram) but there is no disk activity at all. I was thinking that it would > be at least some reads if the xfs_repair is doing something. That is very low RAM for a system with two big arrays attached. So if repair finds it needs to repair something it's going to take a long time. http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_Which_factors_influence_the_memory_usage_of_xfs_repair.3F Chris Murphy |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 05/16] xfs: decouple inode and bmap btree header files, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: filter projid32bit info out of growfs & info output, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs corrupted, Stefanita Rares Dumitrescu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs corrupted, Emmanuel Florac |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |