>
>hi,
>
>On Jul 24, 4:57pm, Juer Lee wrote:
>> Subject: RE: Backup ACLs
>> >
>> >> >
>> >> >Take a look on the ftp site, there is an rpm of 1.0.11 of
>> >xfsdump here:
>> >> >
>> >> >ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/cmd_rpms/
>> >> >
>> >> >Try this version.
>> >> >
>> >> >Steve
>> >> >
>> >> Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> Ohmm, I have already downloaded it, but I failed to compile
>> >that version
>> >> on my machine (Power PC). So I used version 1.0.2 as I mentioned
>> >> before. Is it my version 2.95.2 GCC's problem?=20
>> >>
>> >> Juer
>> >
>> >Hmm, we need more details than 'failed to compile'
>> >
>> >Steve
>> >
>>
>> When I compiled it, I got error message as
>> xfs_fsr.c:156: 'O_DIRECT' undeclared here (not in a function)
>>
>> Thougn I can modify some code for that, I am not sure if
>other problems
>> I will meet.
>>
>
>If you compile against the XFS headers from the current
>xfsprogs-devel rpms, you should find this problem goes away.
>The Debian porters came across this problem and helped fix it
>quite awhile ago now.
>
>You will then run into the next problem, which is that there
>are no syscall entry points for the ACL and extended attribute
>system calls for the PowerPC architecture, so you will need to
>make changes to your kernel and to the libattr & libacl source
>to implement this.
>
>I'm surprised that the test you did (from your original mail)
>didn't give you errors when you ran "chacl" the first time...
>did you not see an error like:
>"libacl: acl_set system call not defined for this architecture"?
>
>cheers.
>
>--
>Nathan
>
Nathan,
Oh, yes, I have already changed those code for ACl, but I forgot to
mention all since I just met the problems when using xfsdump. So you
needn't feel strange :)
I am now using xfsprogs 1.3.1, need I add xfsprogs-devel rpms?
Under ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/cmd_rpms/, But I find
xfsprogs-1,3,1-pre1.sc.rpm and xfsprogs-devel-1.3.1-pre1.i386.rpm only
there. Which one should I use?
Juer
|