xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Updated XFS merge status

To: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@xxxxxx>, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Updated XFS merge status
From: "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <rabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:30:28 +0200
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20020821111806.A29739@lst.de>
Reply-to: "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <rabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:18:06 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

>Other changes in the XFS tree              2.4     2.4-ac   2.5
>--------------------------------------------------------------------­
>KDB                                           - (7)   - (7)  - (7)
[...]
>(7) Not likely to go in ever. (political reasons)

What are these "political reasons?"

Thanks for filling me in.


-- 
Sign the EU petition against SPAM:          L I N U X       .~.
http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/        The  Choice      /V\
                                            of a  GNU      /( )\
                                           Generation      ^^-^^




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>