| To: | "David Chinner" <dgc@xxxxxxx>, "Eric Sandeen" <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel |
| From: | "Alex Elder" <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 7 Aug 2007 21:13:15 -0700 |
| Cc: | "xfs-oss" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20070808025615.GH52011508@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcfZZ8/+CsI7MncITCidZk+cUHULrAAClkhQ |
| Thread-topic: | qa 166 failure on f8 kernel |
> From: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of > David Chinner > Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 9:56 PM > To: Eric Sandeen > Cc: xfs-oss > Subject: Re: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel ... > mmap dirties entire pages. page size differs between platforms - > ia64 = 16k, x86 = 4k - so the size of the extent allocated is > different. Guess what platform I wrote the test on and use as my > primary platform? > > The output needs better filtering, methinks. Could the test be changed so the output is pagesize independent rather than filtering the output? Or maybe the test should use a buffer size that's the LCM of all supported page sizes. I'm not actually familiar with the test, so forgive me if I'm way off... -Alex |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH 00/25] move handling of setuid/gid bits from VFS into individual setattr functions (RESEND), Miklos Szeredi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel, nscott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel, David Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | RE: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel, nscott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |