xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] dax: handle media errors in dax_do_io

To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] dax: handle media errors in dax_do_io
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 11:17:39 -0700
Cc: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx>, "hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "jack@xxxxxxx" <jack@xxxxxxx>, "axboe@xxxxxx" <axboe@xxxxxx>, "linux-nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx" <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, "viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Wilcox, Matthew R" <matthew.r.wilcox@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=Vv/eF/r9plR/v7wjPrn9RxaKU61ZtDPrLf2WyniEYDI=; b=kBl5aBXs1olKeKMqUR9Nff2JTM+5CdRc9AzhHi5X9Uc9VnGj4zSsQpTL2r7g0h3A65 VKPmYljC6c+sLpxYf3+HrdpMxuvb7nzlgb0IPx4Kne9XacR/sx1NtI8MSL8uwEx+ztAe a+AOAqB7BSyiAxd91CWr2HD4WoG8HX9tFAsyX28qFVYyqZVWwT7SffkGQiHyyZyM0phU SbfJaZE3T2i12omn5AriU4wAUcA7YqG/9XjzVKQuvy47+rEzqAJTAEpfeVoFtQuI8dsI o7IaRfCPE96ZBvo34DadFl5762hI3VSqssfAvAxjBTi23o3jyQ/jMqJIS45bslueQLpa z2Jg==
In-reply-to: <x49lh4e6928.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1459303190-20072-1-git-send-email-vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx> <1459303190-20072-6-git-send-email-vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx> <x49twj26edj.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1460739288.3012.3.camel@xxxxxxxxx> <x49potq6bm2.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1460741821.3012.11.camel@xxxxxxxxx> <CAPcyv4hemNM4uQYCPBXyH+DWTOLvyBNBeMYstKbPdad_Cw48HQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <x49lh4e6928.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>>>> There's a lot of special casing here, so you might consider adding
>>>> comments.
>>>
>>> Correct - maybe we should reconsider wrapper-izing this? :)
>>
>> Another option is just to skip dax_do_io() and this special casing
>> fallback entirely if errors are present.  I.e. only attempt dax_do_io
>> when: IS_DAX() && gendisk->bb && bb->count == 0.
>
> So, if there's an error anywhere on the device, penalize all I/O (not
> just writes, and not just on sectors that are bad)?  I'm not sure that's
> a great plan, either.
>

If errors are rare how much are we actually losing in practice?
Moreover, we're going to do the full badblocks lookup anyway when we
call ->direct_access().  If we had that information earlier we can
avoid this fallback dance.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>