| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Open for contribution towards xfstests for btrfs |
| From: | Kiran Patil <kirantpatil@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 7 Jan 2013 22:39:20 +0530 |
| Cc: | linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=+QRK7wn0BDJ2LPQd+utuZO6p9jF5cWSYQPb0ZYRtvzI=; b=mM7xZ5hECb0gZO17bdTHVPigEaSUkEEzOHAkK0LXJj4+M8Y9RqUiEaKsQBLAp4KiEj 7Fk4UZnoruz3DEluLL8aWDRXdqwSwG1PbQ4J0SLjBnu7YXFy9y5V1oDEQFVwVc1JgeJK sJFf9g0dKC0JdhU2nN5jNfX/ECh42B++9RWp2aFZhrfO2jcw7rbZfnJTYfDlpuyMQ5hG q3hwLRHCIypJhX5AVPJYpCzMzuqQDFAKM9pvwKMqzwXqR1fweVDBlM+xdFS7+L+SsZon mHfFzIWYmCCmDHpC/uwlw5RrBoYLi5DhFMRiSY3KoYUe2FiTfkLL4Bs6o/BiBGRIONuh iQcg== |
| In-reply-to: | <CANT588t+jcOZNv4w1azXkuywEbSh_+F_AtrUo=3=1P4j+Aesjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <CANT588vv8xYNWGBSZUDu0vui2ZH4QqL7tvQX8zOGof7nucC6_Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CANT588tZd8y3G0jZD3Ti-nHexk1jwmD-fJP1f1bttFP8kyEgqg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <50EAF092.20907@xxxxxxxxxx> <CANT588t+jcOZNv4w1azXkuywEbSh_+F_AtrUo=3=1P4j+Aesjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Kiran Patil <kirantpatil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 1/7/13 4:18 AM, Kiran Patil wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> We have a team of 5 students who would like to contribute to btrfs >>> filesystem testing using xfstests. >>> >>> Is there space for them to contribute? >>> >>> If yes, to whom do they need to keep in touch for guidance. >> >> (cc: xfs list) >> >> Are you thinking of writing new tests, or doing more formal testing >> with the existing testsuite? Both would be useful. >> >> In particular, any time there's a bugfix, a regression test is helpful. >> Generic new tests of btrfs functionality would be good, too. >> >> I would suggest starting with a couple new tests, and cc: the xfs list >> for review. In the course of the review you'll get a sense of the various >> conventions used in xfstests, etc. >> >> Simply running xfstests over various btrfs configurations would also >> be useful, to be sure any regressions caught by existing tests don't go >> unnoticed. >> >> thanks, >> -Eric >> > Dear Eric and David, > > Thanks a lot for your inputs. > > We will work on them and soon we will start our work. > > Thank you, > > -Kiran Sorry, I forgot to say thanks to Liu and Arne. Thank you Liu and Arne for your suggestions. -Kiran |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Open for contribution towards xfstests for btrfs, Kiran Patil |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | xfs bug?, Linos |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Open for contribution towards xfstests for btrfs, Kiran Patil |
| Next by Thread: | xfs bug?, Linos |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |