| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Cyclic Code? |
| From: | Adil Mujeeb <mujeeb.adil@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:22:33 +0530 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LeQvDuTi2/nZp22ZLjx6hiiYcECW6oUuUw+McTv9T1A=; b=efBDSr3Dq1cM8WQz/LmL+MjKzDp4BvaVcxPeLex7wx5g5BQVterl7wefFU0NveHxD5 Fwj7CmdrRSj9MLXGLdLLFOcvoWNk6dpN288lvqHrNr7OUiQqm1nxhco6vqhMT1py0TxP Czm9HarEqksjSCWPyDTeUvbwf9lKojV3CF3n8= |
|
Hi list, i am new to XFS. I was going through XFS code (2.4 based) for study purpose. Its old but assuming its bit simple as compare to latest one. Moreover the XFS code / design structure documents available on the internet is 2.4 based.
The following code snippet is not clear to me (seems cyclic): --------- ... ... #define XFS_IFORK_NEXTENTS(ip,w) xfs_ifork_nextents(ip,w)
... xfs_ifork_nextents(xfs_inode_t *ip, int w) { return XFS_IFORK_NEXTENTS(ip, w); } ... ... #define XFS_IFORK_NEXTENTS(ip,w) XFS_CFORK_NEXTENTS(&ip->i_d, w)
... #define XFS_CFORK_NEXTENTS(dcp,w) xfs_cfork_nextents(dcp,w) ... int xfs_cfork_nextents(xfs_dinode_core_t *dcp, int w) { return XFS_CFORK_NEXTENTS(dcp, w);
} ---- Am i missing something? Thanks, Adil
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfsdump: use the full 32-bit generation number, David Brown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS: bad clientid on recovery on MIPS (VIPT cache), Ajeet Yadav |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] xfsdump: fix restore of ext attrs on root directory, Bill Kendall |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Cyclic Code?, Amit Sahrawat |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |