xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Inconsistencies with trusted.SGI_ACL_{FILE,DEFAULT}

To: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Inconsistencies with trusted.SGI_ACL_{FILE,DEFAULT}
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 23:05:49 +0200
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat_com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Mvj65ajlc6a5rSP9EEg2ymVQhq0BJJpCKmr4CEIE4FQ=; b=TzeKscdU5UZzucyxSNczd+dckIXDf68lN5MLJuO+OedzQDC84d81cUMUs3OXXT3nOq FGGyF7k3gepSY+o6A9JvvSweJxAziobC9+Wl3dNVQ/kvWeNRevBO1DLDlQGjbVBdurwp sFVDy8iLOjLFSywFiQMQak4/bi2qQGK5nS5lAGgwL02euIcyRDWejXoDZtTJj7C1+15Q hb3hwQBXMgaq3E9MgKxRYY/hSWCfrFl8sSXmyANKLXoURYX4A9X6GfU5PO2xWGxzNmcJ W49Uda9KZvmbNCSBe7QhKMkMI3He2mGO1Ys6biqFXp8rBcgYjoNEIMxDDN7jvPRQRJOu 2Sxg==
In-reply-to: <20151024152254.GA22232@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CAHc6FU5gS4BA+iTRHo1oHJMVHkLs4aa0eYd5T1ftLC9biRaxrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20151024125659.GA8095@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAHc6FU6eVn=KpKvhD2N8hvAgdFQVdBHHS9tUgaVQJf5wnipY=g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20151024152254.GA22232@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 03:58:04PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>> The posix_acl_* attributes are handled by the vfs
>> posix_acl_*_xattr_handler handlers which talk to the filesystem using
>> the get_acl and set_acl inode operations. We would need such handlers
>> for SGI_ACL_*, installed before xfs_xattr_trusted_handler in
>> xfs_xattr_handlers.
>>
>
> Yes, but the translation all occurs on the XFS side. I'm not following
> the last bit... are you suggesting a special xattr handler that uses
> "trusted.SGI_FILE" as a prefix?

Yes.

> I'm not sure that matters either way so
> long as those xattrs are trapped appropriately, but feel free to send a
> patch. :)

I'll send some patches.

Andreas

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>