xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v18 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4)

To: "Volker.Lendecke@xxxxxxxxx" <Volker.Lendecke@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4)
From: Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:28:44 -0500
Cc: Cristoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Allison <jra@xxxxxxxxx>, Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>, "linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux API <linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, XFS Developers <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TeKlUcRlRsLKiN2eSqawggdWdiGqcOp+QeKTsoLscog=; b=yT6Uxo/wVjFlS3Eg4IAIwF7J80l2C2Ovg8iqqIU3UChvEcS58QNIc4OmzuwRZ/tCfN +T8PGI4YiIuOP3cypxTTr50tM4ZVKQDOn2zerGk7i+PYh/M6N7co8LfkFEwKbnvLURKD Q9tG+C0Fx/OYou4J8lSuVOem26ZkaMnWyOT03u610uSYFyenOHe7dM9ckuNt+ACNNTTL 4RUWjh2J1S7hH7RafUr0gtCXeYAlRTcmlLjLlj1bvhmMTevL6wdB/MoUPhMcCZGDDCEn 2kR4OPibzSAnIIeov5EAQSxNOklel+jNdFdkNhWfEl+xIZAWYNzDDGmlMUxUSNDoRVDR ncvA==
In-reply-to: <20160315201700.GA22945@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <1456733847-17982-1-git-send-email-agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx> <20160311140134.GA14808@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAHc6FU4t3yisCM=MXrHRmCja_A8eZOpVa1smJ0gUhv+vuUAuXA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160315071103.GC19747@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160315154514.GB39038@jra3> <20160315201700.GA22945@xxxxxxxxx>
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Volker Lendecke
<Volker.Lendecke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 08:45:14AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:11:03AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> > People have long learned that we only have 'alloc' permissions.  Any
>> > model that mixes allow and deny ACE is a mistake.
>>
>> People can also learn and change though :-). One of the
>> biggest complaints people deploying Samba on Linux have is the
>> incompatible ACL models.
>
> Just to confirm: I see this a lot in the field. NFSv4 ACLs, while not a
> perfect match for NTFS ACLs are a lot closer much more usable to people
> who want to serve Windows clients.

Yes (and presumably Macs as well)



-- 
Thanks,

Steve

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>