| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS_REPAIR on LVM partition |
| From: | Rafael Weingartner <rafaelweingartner@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 15 Dec 2013 22:34:43 -0200 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Mw0tGsDm9+z9jCN8A8028i2+Oj6kMYDwTnKtsUpiJzY=; b=uLLLSj7sSWAX1RWZK4zxlKdQnK3VeI8dM26RMYDjdhvCv54D42fdFn8sBpdDsHH+j3 JlInBFTHVzKrEZLfzNXSNTLyY0AmKqCY+42tvou6JSHO00xmbawh0qCkY0e9R59Tei4V o4UEj0R8zdK3ASfmtxmnhHbHNPsxwLz+dylFQNzg1Y0fNfWaT4lJ4swuHSTWhiiWyXIW PBiQZZz0ab4hQx3wjfy2nIKtah+86JNZZOfoeZ1tsCUu1LAWJqnloRQT56JfRp0FoyKi TNF1hqxkCP/aeXeIxaxjfYNBb8gA+I7b5eRhdB4ikPb3d9KqwK/4jYrmaEfNmpoxCmjD ar9g== |
| In-reply-to: | <20131216000141.GU31386@dastard> |
| References: | <CAG97raf61XGnTakrYjcfv9cjM6CTVdEEB3wQK+wOBvpowWO3Cw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131216000141.GU31386@dastard> |
|
So, sadly I went for the big hammer option, I thought that there were no other options ;). I'm guessing it can't find or validate the primary superblock, so That is exactly what it seems that it is happening.
81.927888] Pid: 878, comm: mount Not tainted 3.5.0-44-generic #67~precise1-Ubuntu Actually, the problem was a little bit more complicated. This LVM2 partition, was using a physical device (PV) that is exported by a RAID NAS controller. This volume exported by the controller was created using a RAID 5, there was a hardware failure in one of the HDs of the array and the volume got unavailable, till we replaced the bad driver with a new one and the array rebuild finished. That's an old version of xfsprogs - you might want to start by So, a good try should be upgrading to xfsprogs 3.11 and running xfs_repair again.
2013/12/15 Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Rafael Weingärtner
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: xfs_trans_dqresv() can be made lockless, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: usefulness of 'security attr' being non-copiable on discretionary access linux., LA Walsh |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS_REPAIR on LVM partition, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS_REPAIR on LVM partition, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |