| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Transactional XFS? |
| From: | Grozdan <neutrino8@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:15:46 +0100 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hd1fEHdEjoqfAygVdf0wDdVpwttr9XuxArQ1ulWtw0o=; b=LsURvxXINRLH21QDE1bT3rX9RPOmriu8mqPMgXvYmAVsb1Dre3///xE0zfNqsFUVYy scuQCKdnRL9kaISrJFV7sFWX2icpS34wkQeg5qVoNK4OLqUTUwv9wafQytgEaMpooQA2 6p6EX/tCEcI5v9BPfybibeuj1gA6rRYNyYUYM= |
Hi, I just finished watching the excellent speech of Dave Chinner at linux.conf.au and I must say I'm impressed by the recent improvements to XFS. Towards the end of the talk, Dave talked about upcoming improvements on Metadata reliability and other features. What I'm wondering about is if there are any plans in making XFS transactional (fully atomic) like it is the case with recent NTFS versions on Windows Vista and higher? Thanks |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS unlink still slow on 3.1.9 kernel ?, Richard Ems |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: quotacheck speed, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 1/1] xfs: fix buffer flushing during log unmount, Amit Sahrawat |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Transactional XFS?, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |