| To: | stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Consistent throughput challenge -- fragmentation? |
| From: | Brian Cain <brian.cain@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:38:21 -0600 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=paNqcCSshTuoWXwYWYDO6CgUqqjZId3c/01icdGKitE=; b=vRK3UJekrsBJg1WSzEXXBEbbP3XRbIYp08eT/ORPSLpbOaWpgxx/PLPaMtq9qPjZUE S8BuSDje4cNDJCtfBj/mgQafdWwKB2EvKznfomnfyxOKNcXVPjG40KCowQPUSdzoyxpG Fhe5XK+HB9KZYPhpozj4U7mQwMYt+1Ay2eVl/Uz6LtLRKtVfy7O6OPnc+klDufp4EEIr udL3+PUBrwYabTYK9owqXqnxN2/DWRhnh8Zcu/FGznHJL6CYnRoaqMw72/gibuxHGdMR XjKie4lI77HR3YP3nHXG58/n6sG9GfNOAxW5KEQK9JSKQWx4MEtRnw1folndli1vrSHP 3Blw== |
| In-reply-to: | <512BDA2A.5050600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <CAEWpfG_DKJt1MmWS1tARH4OmYwpSt=A-DzwKkGcD67LuR6k=Bg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <512BDA2A.5050600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: It looks like omitting step #2 and putting all files in the root directory (and modifying step #1 to remove only the files that were associated with that previous test cycle) avoids the poor-performance problem as well. At least, that's the case in testing so far.
-- -Brian |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Consistent throughput challenge -- fragmentation?, Brian Cain |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] xfs: add quota-driven speculative preallocation throttling, Mark Tinguely |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Consistent throughput challenge -- fragmentation?, Brian Cain |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Consistent throughput challenge -- fragmentation?, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |