| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix an assertion failure |
| From: | Zhi Yong Wu <zwu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Jul 2013 19:06:00 +0800 |
| Cc: | xfstests <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=8aKKjcu4SSlx+U7LnGi5UPKHSkSbBWCl/x6n7LayAiY=; b=GfR+okYXCI2a8suQVRrFFV5UN9c/6OAEx5XkA7ccDG7Mbe7BNqDEXhV7kYqs+4nPL/ y+7jPaXlxbcjuTUldnAFBvN1NTETY+1q4zc0pWcQAjv2N2s8Zr5nPKCfUI+h08JIa3re IBdvCG3k8y0SenIxi6b+6l10cuzi/5JM2NEwfiqZbEVDmKB281IAdcBOMF1kxYMfYIZC trt7g8Oy7NIFUio0CapWKN/v1CHCxQnraVtznNfeVbdAVOBC3FBJdXKK+gui6Qsx2cqN G+RUA27t4/PTOajkRG1uzkF78eUlJZa7OWmG5SAYkKkFgFRQGqE7QwZhfd0aLzKxBB+i ncCA== |
| In-reply-to: | <CAEH94Lj27DCzCiWxwerEgwsExtdtviB_+S4bDbxg-wwq445rSA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1374759524-10061-1-git-send-email-zwu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> <20130726020318.GD21982@dastard> <CAEH94LiXtG=DD+Qn4kbNT_Y_Qn65wVYrpYvHKXOob6wru3SeDw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130726113717.GN13468@dastard> <CAEH94Lj27DCzCiWxwerEgwsExtdtviB_+S4bDbxg-wwq445rSA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Zhi Yong Wu <zwu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 02:01:23PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote: >>> No, it still raised the same assertion as below: >>> >>> [ 521.715103] XFS: Assertion failed: !(bip->bli_item.li_flags & >>> XFS_LI_IN_AIL), file: fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c, line: 940 >> >> How are you reproducing it? >> >> Can you take an event trace with trace-cmd and attach the output of >> the report? > After kernel base is switched to Linux 3.11-rc3, when i try to take > event trace with trace-cmd, that issue doesn't appear any more in my > environment. :) When your patch is not applied, i hit this issue sometime today, and take some event trace with trace-cmd, and attach it in this mail. But after your patch is applied, i tried some times, but haven't hit so far, so i want to see if i can hit it in next days. > >> >> Cheers, >> >> Dave. >> -- >> Dave Chinner >> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > -- > Regards, > > Zhi Yong Wu -- Regards, Zhi Yong Wu
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH v2] xfs: introduce object readahead to log recovery, zwu . kernel |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH v7 6/7] xfs: add capable check to free eofblocks ioctl, Brian Foster |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix an assertion failure, Zhi Yong Wu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix an assertion failure, Jeff Liu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |