Re: [PATCH 06/12] xfs: fix the comment of xfs_extent_busy_update_extent()

[Zhi Yong Wu <zwu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 08/11/13 22:14, zwu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>> From: Zhi Yong Wu<wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu<wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>   fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
>> index 85e9f87..4ad8fee 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
>> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ xfs_extent_busy_search(
>>    * extent.  If the overlap covers the beginning, the end, or all of the
>> busy
>>    * extent, the overlapping portion can be made unbusy and used for the
>>    * allocation.  We can't split a busy extent because we can't modify a
>> - * transaction/CIL context busy list, but we can update an entries block
>> + * transaction/CIL context busy list, but we can update an entrie's block
>
>
>                                                               ^^^^^^
>                                                  changed that to entry's
Good catch, thanks.
>
>>    * number or length.
>>    *
>>    * Returns true if the extent can safely be reused, or false if the
>> search
>
>



-- 
Regards,

Zhi Yong Wu