| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove the incorrect entry in the MAINTAINER file |
| From: | Zhi Yong Wu <zwu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 7 Jan 2014 05:57:08 +0800 |
| Cc: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>, Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfstests <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Kglbt3cEEoix3nN/1WRuBLwMDdeMg+e1GuETCMLiYQ8=; b=zFpxd0PQEFWsmk667orQxaE3eTYaiZxlczZE1eA3BYNeW+z0X1A/6YRsytfVxdwhMr AIOYuVCy2DDmg5ZMXTvi2xgYxxluCgHDOp2OKkLTwN8kmWYZFuZLiL6WdtNp0kd1l8q+ uCKtBOuE8XCoWxcyLqGHYQop5VjPE4+Vqy810TCvRyUnhNg3/uVeVsco34L3CyHK5mBA dxfLOAELZFSq9MzMC5KxD1tF4M1w5hIOyQ2IgrW8duSG92AI9OR+Jj6h8R8InpYTQN3s s/+6UCUGlEsUkXiCe8Zyq9PECsdqTm7NHAJK2TCE45yg/NQbLG+0J9V65puIW8NU1T+q zMGA== |
| In-reply-to: | <20131216152053.GB12360@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1386935393-23559-1-git-send-email-zwu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> <20131213163131.GC20803@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131213202747.GL1935@xxxxxxx> <20131213220110.GW10988@dastard> <20131216152053.GB12360@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 09:01:10AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: >> Well, I stand by what I wrote in that thread. There is absolutely >> nothing wrong with having xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx listed as a maintainer; >> different and unusual doesn't mean it is wrong. > > I think life is much better if XFS follows the usual convention. We I agree so, and guess that some guy will submit the same patch later. We will have to roll back to this discussion again. > already drill into submitters heads that they should send patches and > questions to the list for the whole kernel, and the angry behaviour of > many maintainers when they get personal mail helps with that, too. > > Given that we already have maintainers names listed, and the list in the > proper field I also can't see what this should buy us. > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs -- Regards, Zhi Yong Wu |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [ANNOUNCE] xfsprogs; for-3.1.12 branch created., Rich Johnston |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | noob question, Fitzgerald, Dan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove the incorrect entry in the MAINTAINER file, Ben Myers |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] xfstests: aio-stress, use calloc for thread_info array, Jeff Mahoney |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |