| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Insane file system overhead on large volume |
| From: | Manny <dermaniac@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:15:36 +0100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=uEy9WyirNKZx/1CroLa2+GgwDSXK7Z+8BfIJ2nMjuLE=; b=btcRu8w9yxDTGFzjyCiAThDY/ZUVep709Kyt/py4AjrMAO0FrXFYJfJzC9T9a5m8Td NHoSOJoMJoq0ETzEiwlqac1c40TItkDBwtSgT8oC9+MBSuh9cHZ9bdxY20YO5UFh/dDf rYd8uWMAKMXIJr/xesgwu0ImvhghNX1i4/JBM= |
| In-reply-to: | <20120127104413.GA12347@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <CAEBWcAT2zfDskgDjFr0KcnfsT2A65r04AM1cv2-TfnNJTB1__Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120127104413.GA12347@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
> Where did you get the sizes for the raw volume and the filesystem usage > from? Oh my god, you are so right. The raw volume was actually just 24TB. My Raid controller decided to leave 6TB on the VDisk for a Snap pool. Thanks for the hint, and sorry to bother you |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Insane file system overhead on large volume, Stan Hoeppner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ANNOUNCE] XFS Developers meeting in San Francisco, April 3rd, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Insane file system overhead on large volume, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Insane file system overhead on large volume, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |