| To: | david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Question about GFP_KERNEL argument in radix_tree_preload |
| From: | Sanidhya Kashyap <sanidhya.gatech@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 22 Mar 2015 23:49:34 -0400 |
| Cc: | changwoo@xxxxxxxxxx, "Kashyap, Sanidhya" <sanidhya@xxxxxxxxxx>, taesoo@xxxxxxxxxx, blee@xxxxxxxxxx, csong@xxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=OCzsiqhS5e+uQ8atKoBoPelOWM/euVQMK2+/sMnnGDY=; b=LxOCqNkf209g1gts7BWopaa/4S6mamWV4GDA8gjdgzJ3537FG59p4Hfi9Q68OC0HPv VQJ8ASwS5F8xMpDpIwKbvM8vlsCqoRhlxlP4LER9/FINHpCRSbNJNd3CUnIH7ZE6/+Jo 42G221DNpuhwrD2445iSdSZVtzg1ARly5hhWgVj8mz4Mdw5SwUUofv8K+7xU7KOVE7A/ opkELAGwsuvurNO2wuP/ulkPwf7I0flpl6UwnL26ed/B3Uy+jxs6CZblgu3nLQC0cPn9 ubEbKH5qW4GjvWPOTkHMt3xqBW9JNZhZYzmEmKUAWfjXdaDV8vQm2VNXj+G3rVn6q1pN HVMw== |
Hello David, We have been doing some analysis on file systems and have a question regarding the GFP_KERNEL flag used in radix_tree_preload in xfs_mru_cache_insert. We think that this should be GFP_NOFS as it is related to the block allocation and other file systems(eg btrfs,ext2) are also using GFP_NOFS for the same. It would be great if you can let us know your reason for using that flag and which one is the correct option? Thanks, Sanidhya |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/6] xfs: add DAX file operations support, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Question about GFP_KERNEL argument in radix_tree_preload, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] xfs: Fix incorrect positive ENOMEM return, Joe Perches |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Question about GFP_KERNEL argument in radix_tree_preload, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |