| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Xfs_repair segfaults. |
| From: | Filippo Stenico <filippo.stenico@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 7 May 2013 15:36:42 +0200 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=oBeXsloi9UveHeXdQVjqZo62i3eqz6ty5Q6yiODqvy8=; b=SW/fWMi2WnnCyq/Wi22zygIdIQjEDrdBKFUBtGNrsXH8oM7G3REyEr/haj6/357jzq 3DjWWwFzqUm/GLD8FkdCtg1+ERwcM15SFA70agAfb7yO1b7RkSqQu2WnXb2KM5mQLXWQ Iw54VrCBJwOASKDaeJ09clCb9tc5dOv+b99iI2UMe5zAOmWjFvSYMauPEoLWmUlgJb8v QfjK84pQACzvhcF+NjVu/7TWDrDSfxrvKgMMz8NJB+d1KnvSLv2C+Mvie5ibyM8rqyqh HAkEFVXIs6ZWHiChBE4oXm/C9dv9joO8jiHhrOVK5PknrKj658S8Cq9ykB/VZvZD6rY7 f3Ig== |
| In-reply-to: | <5188FF88.6000508@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <CADNx=KsT9DC=vveyTZx8EovddFx9mhRS-yzygaORHZ_4VyXfzQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5187BF8A.2040303@xxxxxxxxxxx> <CADNx=KvZPhbRn9Kc3+KdoAY7jZ3U0uyG6wgUB5vcxX85CkFdQg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CADNx=Kv0bt3fNGW8Y24GziW9MOO-+b7fBGub4AYP70b5gAegxw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5188FF88.6000508@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: I still got back around 6TB out of 7.2 TB of total data stored, so this tells xfs is reliable even when major faults occur...
That's right.... No real way to know where it went from the available data I think. >From attached logs it seems to be: Looks odd to me too. But i just copied the commands issued as they where on my console... so yes, nothing in between. It found a clean log this time: Thanks anyways, I am trying with a "-L" repair, at this step I expect another fail (due out of memory or something, as it happened last time) then I will try with "xfs_repair -L -vv -P" and I expect to see that segfault again. Will report next steps, maybe something interesting for you will pop up... for me is not a waste of time, since this last try is worth being made. -- F |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [BULK] Re: [problem] xfstests generic/311 unreliable..., Josef Bacik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Mount probing not silent. Internal error xfs_sb_read_verify at line 726, Markus Trippelsdorf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Xfs_repair segfaults., Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Xfs_repair segfaults., Filippo Stenico |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |