Re: Is test xfs/096 correct?

xfs

To:	Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: Is test xfs/096 correct?
From:	Jan Tulak <jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 4 Dec 2015 15:04:06 +0100
Cc:	xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20151204130000.GA47882@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<CACj3i71kgpqNvg0ru=-4x6gtJ8faOVn-P=y_AM+xwoKbm-55tQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20151204130000.GA47882@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

max_lr_size refers to the maximum log record size (256k). When a larger
log stripe unit is passed, mkfs warns about it and adjusts to the
default:

âAh, ok, thank you for explaining it to me, I understand the test now. :-)

Cheers,

Janâ

Jan Tulak

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Is test xfs/096 correct?, Jan Tulak Re: Is test xfs/096 correct?, Brian Foster Re: Is test xfs/096 correct?, Jan Tulak <= Re: Is test xfs/096 correct?, Eric Sandeen

Previous by Date:	Re: Is test xfs/096 correct?, Brian Foster
Next by Date:	Re: Is test xfs/096 correct?, Eric Sandeen
Previous by Thread:	Re: Is test xfs/096 correct?, Brian Foster
Next by Thread:	Re: Is test xfs/096 correct?, Eric Sandeen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]