Re: [PATCH 03/19] mkfs: Sanitise the superblock feature macros

[Jan Tulak <jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:01 PM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 11:12:21AM +0200, Jan Tulak wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:05 AM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 3/24/16 6:15 AM, jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Âif (sb_feat.finobt && sb_feat.finobtflag) {
> >Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Âfprintf(stderr,
> > _("warning: finobt not supported without CRC support, disabled.\n"));
> >Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â}
> >Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Âsb_feat.finobt = 0;
> >
> > would suffice as before, no? Meh. Not a big deal I guess....
> >
>
> âChanged. Honestly, I don't like the strings starting at the beginning of
> the line, because it breaks the indentation flow, but the rest of the code
> uses this style, so I should stick to it.â

There's good reason for doing this - it makes it easy to grep the
source code for a specific error that has been emitted. Indentation
is useful for demonstrating logic flow, but it's harmful when it
results in strings you might want to find being split up over
multiple lines.

âMmm, yeah, a valid point. It is caused by the 80 chars limit, but there are reasons for that tooâ...

> Thank you for the review. I will wait a little longer if someone spots
> something more, before sending an updated patchset.â :-)

Just send it - I almost got to pulling in this version and
fixing the various comments directly myself yesterday....

âOK. I will fix what Eric submitted in the mean time, test it to be sure I didn't broke anything and send.

Cheers,

Jan

--

Jan Tulak

jtulak@xxxxxxxxxxÂ/ jan@xxxxxxxx