xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Bad performance with XFS + 2.6.38 / 2.6.39

from [Xupeng Yun] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Bad performance with XFS + 2.6.38 / 2.6.39
From: Xupeng Yun <xupeng@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 10:00:18 +0800
Cc: XFS group <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=Xt/jgqvO5i7tHti4hniH2BOOT0NRyCvC97IXnC2gUh4=; b=hp1LDjU0ODWFBgjd4dcW4XtlSvB0U6s8Jq+X0SHK51zDfZTRAMjy6cJfxBbN7LbbjB IbY20Ac7EbgSzYtH9zkhkxdnIc1L/TKQV69l/96GPPGJXMv9BjDcx2z2OAlcTwMflTIK ZGC9QdMGPirJxaluF07PzrBpXoRyp65VotPYw=
In-reply-to: <20111212010053.GM14273@dastard>
References: <CACaf2aYZ=k=x8sPFJs4f-4vQxs+qNyoO1EUi8X=iBjWjRhy99Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111211233929.GI14273@dastard> <CACaf2aYTsxOBXEJEbQu7gwAminBc3R2usDHvypJW0AqOfnz0Pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111212010053.GM14273@dastard>
Sender: recordus@xxxxxxxxx


On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:00, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Oh, of course, now I remember what the problem is - it's a locking
issue that was fixed in 3.0.11, 3.1.5 and 3.2-rc1.

Got it, thanks.

--
Xupeng Yun
http://about.me/xupeng
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Data corruption, md5 changes on every mount, Dmitry Panov
Next by Date:  Re: XFS causing stack overflow, Andi Kleen
Previous by Thread:  Re: Bad performance with XFS + 2.6.38 / 2.6.39, Dave Chinner
Next by Thread:  Re: Bad performance with XFS + 2.6.38 / 2.6.39, Christoph Hellwig
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]