| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: quota mismatch for NFS mount of XFS filesystem |
| From: | Liam Forbes <loforbes@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 8 Nov 2011 14:49:24 -0900 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20111108225513.GO5534@dastard> |
| References: | <CACXvBApxwWUyYNfRL9rS32t7f04XCDwafbR7fSFjmXg8fJRpTg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111108225513.GO5534@dastard> |
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > That looks like a 32bit variable overflow. In 512 byte blocks > (sectors), 2^32 sectors overflows at 2T. And 5.8T ~= 2T + 2T + 1.8T. > > This is most likely to be an NFS issue - I'm not familiar with the > Linux NFS quota protocol implementation, so I can't really say much > more than that. Additional ad hoc testing seems to bear this out. Thanks! I'll take the problem to Red Hat. -- Regards, -liam -There are uncountably more irrational fears than rational ones. -P. Dolan Liam Forbes HPC Systems Analyst, HPC&S Group Leader, CISSP ARSC, U of AK, Fairbanks lforbes@xxxxxxxx 907-450-8618 fax: 907-450-8605 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Your message to xfs awaits moderator approval, xfs-bounces |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS realtime O_DIRECT failures, Amit Sahrawat |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: quota mismatch for NFS mount of XFS filesystem, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | RE: quota mismatch for NFS mount of XFS filesystem, Burbidge, Simon A |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |