| To: | Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] block: prepare for multipage bvecs |
| From: | Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 15 Apr 2016 06:22:33 +0800 |
| Cc: | Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "open list:DRBD DRIVER" <drbd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>, Keith Busch <keith.busch@xxxxxxxxx>, Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx>, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>, Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxx>, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>, "open list:XFS FILESYSTEM" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <570FA4F7.6020301@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1460634438-26530-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <570FA4F7.6020301@xxxxxxxxx> |
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/14/2016 05:46 AM, Ming Lei wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Interests[1] have been shown in multipage bvecs, so this patchset >> try to prepare for the support and do two things: >> >> 1) the 1st 4 patches use bvec iterator to implement iterate_bvec(), >> then we can drop the non-standard way for iterating bvec, which >> can be thought as a good cleanup for lib/iov_iter.c >> >> 2) remove BIO_MAX_SECTORS & BIO_MAX_SIZE, and now there is only >> one user for each. Once multipage bvecs is introduced, one bio >> may hold lots of sectors, and we should always use sort of BIO_MAX_VECS >> which should be introduced in future and is similiar with current >> BIO_MAX_PAGES. >> >> xfstests(-a auto) have been run over ext4/xfs and no regression found >> by this patchset. > > > We've had too many disasters in the block layer the last few series, I'm > making the 4.7 round a nice and small one. I don't mind taking prep patches > for the multipage bvecs, if they are simple and clean, but that's about the > extent of it. > > Just a heads up. Jens, thanks for your response, and understood your concerns. Please hold on this patchset, and I will check it further and make it better. Thanks, |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 05/10] dm thin: add methods to set and get reserved space, Mike Snitzer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 07/11] xfs: mark reclaimed inodes invalid earlier, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] block: prepare for multipage bvecs, Jens Axboe |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] build: make librt optional for some platforms, Jan Tulak |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |